Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Kimi K2.5 vs o3

Moonshot · released

Wins 5 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents

OpenAI · released

Wins 1 of 7 areas

Facts

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger all-rounder.o3 is better at facts.

Scores updated · 32 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Kimi K2.5$0.60 to read · $3.00 to write$3.60Price from Artificial Analysis
o3$2.00 to read · $8.00 to write$10Price from Artificial Analysis

Kimi K2.5 costs 64% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K2.5 pulls ahead

Where o3 pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 32 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingKimi K2.5

Full coding ranking

AgentsKimi K2.5

Full agents ranking

ReasoningKimi K2.5

Full reasoning ranking

Factso3

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsKimi K2.5

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsKimi K2.5

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsEven

Full following instructions ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Kimi K2.5 or o3?

Kimi K2.5 wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts and long documents. o3 wins facts. They are level on following instructions.

Which is better for coding?

Kimi K2.5. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; o3 wins 1.

Which is cheaper?

Kimi K2.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; o3 costs $2.00 and $8.00. That makes Kimi K2.5 about 64% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 32 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 20 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.