Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
⌘K
UTC
Models822Deals30d271Policy30d82, 18 pendingSources1,158

DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

DeepSeek · released

Wins 4 of 6 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts

Alibaba · released

Wins 1 of 6 areas

Long documents

DeepSeek-V4-Pro is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper and better at long documents.

Scores updated · 33 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the six areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro$1.32 to read · $3.96 to write$5.28Price from DeepSeek's own price page
Qwen3.5 122B A10B$0.40 to read · $3.20 to write$3.60Price from Artificial Analysis

Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 32% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where DeepSeek-V4-Pro pulls ahead

  • Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+19.6points aheadDeepSeek-V4-Pro83.4Qwen3.5 122B A10B63.8
  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+18.6points aheadDeepSeek-V4-Pro43Qwen3.5 122B A10B24.4
  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+17.1points aheadDeepSeek-V4-Pro32.8Qwen3.5 122B A10B15.7

Where Qwen3.5 122B A10B pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+7points aheadQwen3.5 122B A10B12.9DeepSeek-V4-Pro5.9
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+1.6points aheadQwen3.5 122B A10B76.3DeepSeek-V4-Pro74.7

Every test, side by side

All 33 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingDeepSeek-V4-Pro

Full coding ranking

AgentsDeepSeek-V4-Pro
  • BrowseCompDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 19.683.463.8+19.6
  • GDPValDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 17.132.815.7+17.1
  • τ-Bench V3 · BankingDeepSeek-V4-Pro by 14.830.115.3+14.8
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0DeepSeek-V4-Pro by 14.614.60+14.6

Full agents ranking

ReasoningDeepSeek-V4-Pro

Full reasoning ranking

FactsDeepSeek-V4-Pro

Full facts ranking

Long documentsQwen3.5 122B A10B
  • AA-LCRQwen3.5 122B A10B by 1.674.776.3+1.6

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsEven

Full following instructions ranking

Other results13 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro wins four of the six areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and facts. Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins long documents, and costs 32% less. They are level on following instructions.

Which is better for coding?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro. It wins 8 of the 8 coding tests both models report; Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins none.

Which is cheaper?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro costs $1.32 per million input tokens and $3.96 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.40 and $3.20. That makes Qwen3.5 122B A10B about 32% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 33 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 20 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 13 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.

Compare DeepSeek-V4-Pro with

DeepSeek

Across the field

Compare Qwen3.5 122B A10B with

Alibaba

Across the field

All comparisons