VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
PKT
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Questions this page answers

Which is better, Kimi K2.6 or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
Across 35 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 scores higher on 32 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on 3. The widest gap is critpt, where Kimi K2.6 scores 8 against 0.9. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $0.91 per million input tokens).

Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Across 35 shared benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 scores higher on 32 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B on 3. The widest gap is critpt, where Kimi K2.6 scores 8 against 0.9. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.40 against $0.91 per million input tokens).

MoonshotvsAlibaba35 shared benchmarks323 head-to-head
BenchmarkKimi K2.6Qwen3.5 122B A10B
AA Agentic Index58.721.3
AA Intelligence45.132.8
AA-LCR76.770.3
AA-Omniscience6.4-41.5
arena_vision12811246
Artificial Analysis Coding Index61.845.7
baby_vision68.540.2
browsecomp86.363.8
coding_arena_elo15091358
critpt80.9
gdpval41.424.3
GPQA Diamond91.186.6
HLE37.547.5
IFBench7676.1
LiveCodeBench v689.678.9
mathvision93.286.2
MMLU-Pro87.186.7
MMMU-Pro80.176.9
OJBench60.639.5
OmniScience Accuracy32.824.4
OmniScience Non-Hallucination60.712.9
OSWorld-Verified73.158
scicode53.542
SWE-bench Verified80.272
TauBench V3 - Banking23.315.3
Terminal-Bench 2.066.749.4
Terminal-Bench 2.165.947.6
Terminal-Bench Hard43.931.1
vectara_answer_rate99.799.8
vectara_avg_summary_length116.786.4
vectara_factual_consistency89.288.8
vectara_hallucination_rate10.811.2
WideSearch80.860.5
τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)95.993.6
τ³-Bench20.613.6

Best tracked score per model per benchmark (default configuration; source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (moonshot-official, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.