Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Wins 1 of 7 areas
Facts
Wins 6 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions
Qwen3.5 122B A10B is the stronger all-rounder.Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at facts.
Scores updated · 38 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video14Qwen3.5 122B A10B4 of 6 tests · 1 tie
- CodingWriting and fixing software14Qwen3.5 122B A10B4 of 5 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own03Qwen3.5 122B A10B3 of 4 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts02Qwen3.5 122B A10B2 of 2 tests
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked02Qwen3.5 122B A10B2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking12Qwen3.5 122B A10B2 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up21Gemini 2.5 Pro2 of 3 tests
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs 68% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3.5 122B A10B pulls ahead
- Finds hard-to-locate facts by browsing the webBrowseComp+53.9points ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+27points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+19.1points ahead
Where Gemini 2.5 Pro pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+14.7points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+6.6points ahead
- Research-level physics problemsCritPt+2points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 38 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingQwen3.5 122B A10B
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Qwen3.5 122B A10B by 19.128.547.6+19.1
- LMArena · WebDevQwen3.5 122B A10B by 136 rating points12241360+136 rating
- SWE-bench VerifiedQwen3.5 122B A10B by 8.863.272+8.8
- SciCodeGemini 2.5 Pro by 6.646.339.7+6.6
- Terminal-Bench HardQwen3.5 122B A10B by 4.626.531.1+4.6
AgentsQwen3.5 122B A10B
- BrowseCompQwen3.5 122B A10B by 53.99.963.8+53.9
- GDPValQwen3.5 122B A10B by 15.7015.7+15.7
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingQwen3.5 122B A10B by 5.69.715.3+5.6
- Terminal-Bench 4.0tie00tie
ReasoningQwen3.5 122B A10B
- Humanity's Last ExamQwen3.5 122B A10B by 7.21825.2+7.2
- GPQA DiamondQwen3.5 122B A10B by 2.183.685.7+2.1
- CritPtGemini 2.5 Pro by 22.60.6+2
FactsGemini 2.5 Pro
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyGemini 2.5 Pro by 14.73924.4+14.7
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterGemini 2.5 Pro by 4.2711.2+4.2
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationQwen3.5 122B A10B by 3.89.112.9+3.8
Images and chartsQwen3.5 122B A10B
Long documentsQwen3.5 122B A10B
- AA-LCRQwen3.5 122B A10B by 7.36976.3+7.3
- LongBench v2Qwen3.5 122B A10B by 1.458.860.2+1.4
Following instructionsQwen3.5 122B A10B
- IFBenchQwen3.5 122B A10B by 2748.775.7+27
- Multi-ChallengeQwen3.5 122B A10B by 7.953.661.5+7.9
Other results13 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Qwen3.5 122B A10B by 39.554.193.6+39.5
- BrowseComp-ZHQwen3.5 122B A10B by 37.732.269.9+37.7
- AA-OmniscienceGemini 2.5 Pro by 25.2-16.4-41.5+25.2
- HMMT 2025Qwen3.5 122B A10B by 24.665.790.3+24.6
- MATH-VisionQwen3.5 122B A10B by 12.973.386.2+12.9
- AA Agentic IndexQwen3.5 122B A10B by 6.13.59.6+6.1
- vectara_factual_consistencyGemini 2.5 Pro by 4.29388.8+4.2
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGemini 2.5 Pro by 20 rating points106.486.4+20 rating
- VideoMMMUGemini 2.5 Pro by 1.683.682+1.6
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemini 2.5 Pro by 146.745.7+1
- MMLU-Protie8686.7tie
- vectara_answer_ratetie99.199.8tie
- AA Intelligencetie1515.6tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Qwen3.5 122B A10B?
Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. Gemini 2.5 Pro wins facts.
Which is better for coding?
Qwen3.5 122B A10B. It wins 4 of the 5 coding tests both models report; Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 1.
Which is cheaper?
Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.40 and $3.20. That makes Qwen3.5 122B A10B about 68% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 38 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 25 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 13 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.