Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GPT-4o vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

OpenAI · released

Wins 1 of 7 areas

Facts

Alibaba · released

Wins 6 of 7 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Images and charts · Long documents · Following instructions

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is the stronger all-rounder.GPT-4o is better at facts.

Scores updated · 28 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GPT-4o$5.00 to read · $15.00 to write$20Price from Artificial Analysis
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.38 to read · $2.25 to write$2.63Price from Alibaba's own price page

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 87% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3.6 35B A3B pulls ahead

  • Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+49.5points aheadQwen3.6 35B A3B80.4GPT-4o30.9
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+40.2points aheadQwen3.6 35B A3B73.4GPT-4o33.2
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+31.5points aheadQwen3.6 35B A3B84.1GPT-4o52.6

Where GPT-4o pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 28 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingQwen3.6 35B A3B

Full coding ranking

AgentsQwen3.6 35B A3B
  • GDPValQwen3.6 35B A3B by 19.8019.8+19.8

Full agents ranking

ReasoningQwen3.6 35B A3B

Full reasoning ranking

FactsGPT-4o

Full facts ranking

Images and chartsQwen3.6 35B A3B
  • MathVistaQwen3.6 35B A3B by 2561.486.4+25
  • CharXiv (RQ)Qwen3.6 35B A3B by 19.258.878+19.2
  • MMMU-ProQwen3.6 35B A3B by 18.756.375+18.7
  • MMMUQwen3.6 35B A3B by 9.572.281.7+9.5

Full images and charts ranking

Long documentsQwen3.6 35B A3B
  • AA-LCRQwen3.6 35B A3B by 15.75671.7+15.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsQwen3.6 35B A3B
  • IFBenchQwen3.6 35B A3B by 28.43664.4+28.4

Full following instructions ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GPT-4o or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B wins six of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, images and charts, long documents and following instructions. GPT-4o wins facts.

Which is better for coding?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B. It wins 4 of the 4 coding tests both models report; GPT-4o wins none.

Which is cheaper?

GPT-4o costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.38 and $2.25. That makes Qwen3.6 35B A3B about 87% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 28 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 16 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.