Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiMo V2 Omni
Wins 2 of 7 areas
Images and charts · Following instructions
Wins 5 of 7 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents
MiMo V2 Omni is the stronger all-rounder.Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper and better at images and charts.
Scores updated · 20 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the seven areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03MiMo V2 Omni3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software12MiMo V2 Omni2 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up01MiMo V2 Omni1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01MiMo V2 Omni1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01MiMo V2 Omni1 of 1 test
- Images and chartsUnderstanding pictures, charts and video10Gemma 4 26B A4B1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Gemma 4 26B A4B1 of 1 test
Agents, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 78% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where MiMo V2 Omni pulls ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+57.4points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+37.5points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+37.5points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 20 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMiMo V2 Omni
- SWE-bench VerifiedMiMo V2 Omni by 57.417.474.8+57.4
- Terminal-Bench HardMiMo V2 Omni by 21.213.634.8+21.2
- SciCodeGemma 4 26B A4B by 3.34036.7+3.3
ReasoningMiMo V2 Omni
- GPQA DiamondMiMo V2 Omni by 3.679.282.8+3.6
- Humanity's Last ExamMiMo V2 Omni by 2.819.322.1+2.8
- CritPtMiMo V2 Omni by 1.101.1+1.1
FactsMiMo V2 Omni
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMiMo V2 Omni by 37.513.651.1+37.5
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracytie19.119.3tie
Images and chartsGemma 4 26B A4B
- LMArena · VisionGemma 4 26B A4B by 32 rating points12601228+32 rating
- MMMU-Protie69.269.9tie
Following instructionsGemma 4 26B A4B
- IFBenchGemma 4 26B A4B by 18.972.453.5+18.9
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA Agentic IndexMiMo V2 Omni by 47.61158.6+47.6
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)MiMo V2 Omni by 47.643.691.2+47.6
- AA-OmniscienceMiMo V2 Omni by 30.7-50.8-20.1+30.7
- Claw Eval (pass@3)MiMo V2 Omni by 26.82854.8+26.8
- AA IntelligenceMiMo V2 Omni by 7.216.723.9+7.2
- PinchBenchMiMo V2 Omni by 6.574.781.2+6.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexGemma 4 26B A4B by 3.839.335.5+3.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or MiMo V2 Omni?
MiMo V2 Omni wins five of the seven areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and long documents. Gemma 4 26B A4B wins images and charts and following instructions, and costs 78% less.
Which is better for coding?
MiMo V2 Omni. It wins 2 of the 3 coding tests both models report; Gemma 4 26B A4B wins 1.
Which is cheaper?
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo V2 Omni costs $0.40 and $2.00. That makes Gemma 4 26B A4B about 78% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 20 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 13 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.